Cannabis has long been touted as containing chemicals that might work against cancer. A recent study suggested that two chemicals found in cannabis, the ca. Cannabis has long been touted as containing chemicals that might work against cancer. A recent study suggested that two chemicals found in cannabis, the. Is medical cannabis all it's cracked up to be? ghid-supraveghere.info Hype Around Cannabis As A Treatment For Cancer Is Undeserved. Cannabis has long been touted.
cannabis as a treatment cancer for is undeserved around Hype
This study achieved its main aim, which was to see if THC was tolerated in these patients without serious side effects, but all of the patients in the study ultimately died within the time expected if they had received no further treatment. Research is ongoing into cannabinoids around the world, but as Emma Smith, senior science information officer at Cancer Research UK, told me: There are also many other promising — and potentially even more effective — avenues that scientists are exploring for glioma.
Alisertib is also already in human clinical trials for a number of different cancer types, so arguably this research is a lot closer to potentially helping patients with glioma, as it is likely to have fewer hurdles to jump over before approval than treatments that are yet to prove themselves in trials.
It would be great to hear more about potential treatments at a more advanced stage like this, but it is unlikely to result in the thousands of shares and likes on Facebook that cannabis invites. So why are we not equally as excited about the numerous other promising preliminary experiments of a similar nature? It is not simply a question of us not hearing about them — cannabis is perceived as special and causes a stir every time a fairly preliminary piece of research comes out.
This, too, must come with some caution. Ruth Plummer , professor of experimental cancer medicine at Newcastle University and clinical co-ordinator of the trial, said it was at an early stage with safe doses and potential side effects still being explored. Supporters of cannabis as a cancer treatment claim that as the chemicals are plant-based, they are safer and less toxic than conventional chemotherapies.
The very well established chemotherapy agents doxorubicin originally from soil bacteria and vincristine originally from the Madagascan periwinkle plant do both have side-effects, so this assumption is not supported by science. They have also been proved to work effectively only when purified and used in controlled doses — something that would need to be figured out from research if cannabinoids are to be a useful part of our arsenal against cancer.
If cannabinoids do have a role to play in treating cancer, scientists and doctors will welcome the advances. The reality is that cannabis simply cannot do this. Arsenic, plutonium and cyanide are also natural, yet it would be a poor strategy to binge on these substances.
The active compounds of many drugs are themselves discovered in plants, synthesised to control the dose and maximise efficacy. We already have THC-derived medicines, but these do not cure cancer, and neither does cannabis.
This is abject nonsense. Such a conspiracy would be massive and would rapidly collapse. The idea that researchers would be callous enough to suppress a cancer cure, and the rewards that would go with it, is ludicrous. The reality is that cancer is a complex family of disease, and it is unlikely that there will ever be a single cure.
Three reasons why scientific advice on drugs is ignored. An ingredient in cannabis may be useful for treating psychosis — new study. Should we be worried about indoor air pollution? Offences against the person? The poetics of retreat: Meditation and space at the shrine in Mahan — York, York. Available editions United Kingdom. More on evidence-based articles about cannabis: Three reasons why scientific advice on drugs is ignored An ingredient in cannabis may be useful for treating psychosis — new study.
Cancer Cannabis Medical marijuana Is it true? Your donation helps deliver fact-based journalism. Role of cannabis in medicine does not strengthen argument for legalisation.
Most popular on The Conversation Tiny houses look marvellous but have a dark side:
Hype Around Cannabis As A Treatment For Cancer Is Undeserved
DrugScope Press Release: Drug treatment figures show the system is . Hype around cannabis as a treatment for cancer is undeserved. For instance, in I wrote about Dr. Lukas Wartman, at the time a . which cut off a tumor's blood supply, or other much-hyped treatments have been. you need to ask those here to look at your genome db proposal while on weed. In fact, I'll happily direct to you, duly, the undeserved overflow of. in the cannabis plant” including “around 80” different types of cannabinoids, .. V , Hype around cannabis as a treatment for cancer is undeserved,The.